Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4077 (ALL)

ANURADHA SAXENA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6401/2026 · 2026-05-06

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6401 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. Learned counsel for parties, at the outset, submit that the controversy involve in present writ petition is squarely covered by a judgment passed by this Court in Ritu Singh and others vs. State of U.P. and others, 2025:AHC:176959, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of judgment passed by this Court in Ritu Singh (supra). May 7, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Surendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Anuradha Saxena And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad