Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4076 (RAJ)

SHAMBU DAYAL MEHRA SON OF SHRI RAMPRASAD MEHRA v. UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19608/2022 · 2026-02-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9321] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19608/2022 Shambu Dayal Mehra Son Of Shri Ramprasad Mehra, Aged About 46 Years, House No. 23, Hanuman Vatika Colony, Pidhi Ki Talai, Kanjara Ki Dhani, Tehsil - Amer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. University Of Rajasthan, Through Its Vice Chancellor, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, University Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Registrar, University Of Rajasthan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, University Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Deputy Registrar (A And F), University Of Rajasthan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, University Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Maloo HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/02/2026 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- 1. Direct the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner from the initial date of his appointment along with all consequential benefits as granted to all the similarly appointed employees. 2. Direct the respondents to award the cost of litigation and damages in terms of the continued harassment meted out to the petitioner by the respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:9321] (2 of 2) [CW-19608/2022] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /99