IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76119 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== 1. Tulsi Tiwari @ Tulsi Das Tiwari S/o Late Babulal Tiwari R/o Village - Salampur, P.S - Amarpur, District - Banka 2. Subash Tiwari S/o Late Babulal Tiwari R/o Village - Salampur, P.S - Amarpur, District - Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 4 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case no. 141 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(3), 117(2), 352, 351(2), 105 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the five named accused persons including the two petitioners herein are said to have abused and assaulted the father-in-law of the informant with dabiya and lathi seriously injuring him. He sustained fracture of both his legs as also injury on his face. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76119 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. The injured died 46 days later in course of treatment. The allegations are general and omnibus in nature. The petitioners are in custody since 7.6.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that in the post-mortem report, the cause of death has not been mentioned by the Doctor and the opinion is reserved. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioners in the FIR and the subsequent death of the father-in-law of the informant, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail and the application is rejected. 7. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after six months or on framing of charge, whichever is later. sauravkrsinha/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T