- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010459782023 NC: 2026:KHC:50892 WP No. 19911 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 19911 OF 2023 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUNIRAJU, S/O. GUPPALLA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 2. SMT. LAKSHAMAMMA, W/O. MARIYAPPA, D/O. GUPPALLA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT BHAKTHIPURA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 106. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMU K.S., ADVOCATE, SRI. K.P.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI. S.MAHENDRA KUMAR, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN, BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010459782023 NC: 2026:KHC:50892 WP No. 19911 of 2023 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560001. 4. SHRI. MUNIYAPPA S/O. LATE BHAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. SHRI. CHODDAPPA, S/O. LATE BHAJAPPA, RESPONDENTS NO.4 AND 5 ARE R/AT ANEKAL TOWN, ANEKAL, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 106. 6. SHRI. AJJA REDDY S/O. BHADRA REDDY, BHAKTHIPURA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 106. 7. THE TAHASILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562106. 8. SRI. CHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, S/O. LATE BHADRA REDDY, R/AT BAKSHIPURA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562107. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 AND R7; SRI. B.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R6; SRI. S.NAGESH, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING PROPOSED R8 ON IA 1/25) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010459782023 NC: 2026:KHC:50892 WP No. 19911 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The petition was listed on 31.07.2026. On that day also, there was no representation, hence, it was ordered to be listed today. Accordingly, the office has listed the matter today i.e., 17.09.2025. As noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears, the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18