Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 407 (PNJ)

SATNAM SINGH v. AMAR KAUR AND ORS

RSA/337/2013 · 2026-03-27

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[207] Satnam Sin Amar Kaur Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] [2] [3] disposed of 27.03.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA RSA-337 Date of De am Singh Versus r Kaur through her LRs and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Ashok Giri, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Mandeep Singh Sachdev, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appell Dismissed for non-prosecution All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 337-2013 (O&M) of Decision : 27.03.2026 …Appellant ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN hdev, Senior Advocate with ocate appellant pleads no instructions. cution. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:21 I agree to specified portions of this document