Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4069 (KAR)

MR RIZWAN v. MRS KAUSAR TAJ

WP/1040/2022 · 2026-04-24

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22502 W.P. No.1040/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.1040/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MR. RIZWAN S/O SHAMSHAD @ LATE SARDAR AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. 2. MR. IMRAN S/O SHAMSHAD @ LATE SARDAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. 3. MR. NASIR S/O SHAMSHAD @ LATE SARDAR AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT KIDWAINAGAR CHINTAMANI TOWN-563125. 4. SMT. DILSHAD W/O SHAFIULLA D/O LATE MOHAMED IBRHIM AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 5. SMT. GULTAJ W/O LATE MOHAMED IBRAHIM AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 6. SMT. JABEEN TAJ W/O INAYATULLA D/O LATE MOHAMMED IBRAHIM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 7. SMT. ZAREEN TAJ W/O LATE MOHAMED ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 8. SRI. MOHAMED ASHRAF Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22502 W.P. No.1040/2022 S/O LATE MOHAMED ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT KIDWAINAGARA WARD NO.28 CHINTAMANI TOWN-563125 CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S. ADV.,) AND: 1. MRS. KAUSAR TAJ W/O LATE MOHAMED ALTAF AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 2. KUM. MISBAH SULTHANA D/O LATE MOHAMED ALTAF AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS. 3. KUM. RUKHASR SULTHANA D/O LATE MOHAMED ALTAF AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS. 4. MAST. MOHAMED SAQHLAIN S/O LATE MOHAMED ALTAF AGED ABOUT 09 YEARS. RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 3 ARE MINORS AND THEY ARE REP. BY THEIR NATURAL MOTHER SMT. KAUSAR TAJ RESPONDENT NO.1. RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 4 ALL ARE R/AT. SIDDIMUTT VILLAGE DODDAGANJUR POST KASABA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK-563125. 5. SMT. JABEEN TAJ W/O SYED RAFIQ PASHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22502 W.P. No.1040/2022 AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O KIDWAINAGARA CHINTAMANI TOWN-563125 CHICKABALLAPUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD.8.12.2021 PASSED ON IA NO.XII IN O.S.NO.395/2014 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED FOR AMENDMENT & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition has become infructuous in view of the dispute in O.S.No.395/2014 having been settled before the Lok Adalat on 12.03.2022. In view of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17