Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:16516
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 567 of 2021 Satish Das, S/o Shri Sudhanidhi Das, Aged About 35 Years R/o Pv-02, Devpur, Police Station Pakhanjur, District North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The S.H.O. Police Station Durgkondul, District North Bastar, Kanker Chhattisgarh, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anway Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Supriya Upasane, Govt. Advocate for the State (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 09/04/2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition rendered infructuous, therefore, he does not want to press SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.04.10 14:40:18 +0530
2 the instant writ petition.
2. The submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the respondent counsel.
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
JUDGE Sumit