Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40689 (CAL)

SUSHIL KUMAR MOHTA v. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE

CRR/217/2025 · 2026-09-15

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15.09.2026 4 to 6 cm CRR 217 of 2025 With CRR 218 of 2025 With CRR 219 of 2025 In the matter of : Sushil Kumar Mohta …. petitioner. In the matter of :M/s. Marlin Housing Limited … petitioner In the matter of : Dilip Kumar Choudhary … petitioner Ms. Khushi Gupta …. for the petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee Mr. Samrat Goswami … for the E. D. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits to have received three written instructions from the respective petitioners expressing their unwillingness to proceed with the instant revisional applications. Let the said written instructions be kept on record. Under such circumstances, the instant revisional applications being CRR 217 of 2025, CRR 218 of 2025 and CRR 219 of 2025 are dismissed for non prosecution. Copy of the order be sent to the learned trial court forthwith. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)