Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4065 (AP)

K. Bhaskara Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17601/2026 · 2026-07-02

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010334622026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17601/2026 Between: 1. K. BHASKARA RAO,, S/O K. CHANDRA RAO (LATE), AGED 55 YEARS SUPERINTENDENT, GOVERNMENT OBSERVATION HOME FOR BOYS, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM- 533101. RIO. D.NO.31-5- 37,MOCHIVEEDHI, BESIDE DARGA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARM - 533101, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, WOMEN, CHILDREN AND DIFFERENTLY ABLED DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI - 522238, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR FAC, JUVENILE WELFARE, CORRECTIONAL SERVICES AND WELFARE OF STREET CHILDREN DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA - 2 520012, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering the representation dt.27.06.2026 of the petitioner seeking to transfer to the post of Regional Inspector of Probation, Vijayawada, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer to the post ofRegional Inspector of Probation, Vijayawada in the ensuing transfers and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer to the post of Regional Inspector of Probation, Vijayawada in the ensuing transfers and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANDALIKA KAVYA SUDHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.17601 of 2026 O R DE R: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of Respondent No.2 in not considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 27.06.2026 seeking to transfer to the post of Regional Inspector of Probation, Vijayawada as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The Petitioner was working as Superintendent at Government Observation Home for Boys in Rajamahendravaram. While so, the Petitioner was given Full Additional Charge of Regional Inspector of Probation, Vijayawada on 27.05.2026 by Respondent No.2. A issued vide Circular Memo No.3301158/GAD/SPFMC/2026, dated 25.06.2026 was issued to fill up the vacancies and also issue orders of transfer, deputation and appointment by transfer orders on or before 05.07.2026 as the posts are to be freezed on account of Amendment to A.P. Public Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order, 2025. 3. In view of the circular, the Petitioner apprehends that the Full Additional Charge post would be filled by a Regular 4 Employee and consequently, the Petitioner would have to continue in Rajamahendravaram. As the spouse of the Petitioner is Stationed in Vijayawada and is working as School Assistant (Telugu)m MPUP School Urdu, Pendyal village, Kanchikacherla Mandal, NTR District, the Petitioner gave a representation dated 27.06.2026 for a consideration of his case for transfer to the post of Regional Inspector of probation, Vijayawada. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Services submits that the representation of the Petitioner would be examined and appropriate decision will be communicated to the Petitioner. 5. Noting the said submission of the Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Respondents to examine the representation of the Petitioner dated 27.06.2026 and pass necessary orders as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. 5 As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.07.2026 Note: Issue C.C. today KLP Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable