Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40648 (MAD)

Jayaprakash @ JP v. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/15793/2026 · 2026-06-23

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 15793 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 15793 of 2026 Jayaprakash @ JP ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham All Women Police Station, Vellore District. Cr.No.3 of 2026. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime No.3 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.A.Vijayasankar For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Crl.side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.02.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 5(l), 5(n), 5(j)(ii) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 64(2)(m), 65(1) of BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No.3 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15793 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner lured the victim girl with seductive words and committed penetrative sexual assault on her. Due to which, she became pregnant. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegation against this petitioner is that the petitioner committed penetrative sexual assault on the minor victim girl. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is the paternal uncle of the victim. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, considering the totality https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15793 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 of the circumstances, the allegation against the petitioner is serious in nature. Considering such serious allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 23-06-2026 SHL To: 1. The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under POCSO Act, 2012 at Vellore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham All Women Police Station, Vellore District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15793 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. SHL CRL OP No. 15793 of 2026 23-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis