IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.866, 928 & 1112/2026 Decided on: 09.01.2026 1. CWP No.866/2026 Rajesh Kumar and others …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others .…Respondents. 2. CWP No.928/2026 Ashwani Kumar and others …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others .…Respondents. 3. CWP No.1112/2026 Subhash Bhardwaj and others …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Thakur and Mr. Viduysh Chauhan, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in all the petitions. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 2. Petitioners are seeking applicability of Yashwant Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 3. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of their grievances raised in the writ petitions. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring a representations within two weeks from today. In case, such representations are so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. 5. The instant petitions are disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 09th January, 2026(yogesh) 2CWP No. 8148 of 2022, decided a/w connected matters on 21.03.2024