CRL.M.C. 3340/2026 Page 1 of 3 $~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3340/2026 SABITA WARI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Gumeet Kaur Kapur, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. SI Pankaj, P.S. CR Par. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 30.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13545/2026 By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (‘BNSS’), the petitioner seeks condonation of about 16 days’ delay in re-filing the present petition. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned. 3. The application is allowed and disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 3340/2026 4. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BNSS, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 0124/2019 dated 16.08.2019 registered under section 289 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) at P.S.: Chitranjan Park, South (Delhi). This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/05/2026 at 11:43:57 CRL.M.C. 3340/2026 Page 2 of 3 5. The petition is premised on a Settlement Agreement dated 17.03.2026, whereby the petitioner and respondent No. 2 have resolved the matter amicably. 6. The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioner and of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs. 7. The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel. 8. The court has interacted with the respondent No. 2, as also with petitioner, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and a Settlement Agreement dated 28.03.2026 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward. 9. Ms. Shubhi Gupta, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed. 10. In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/05/2026 at 11:43:57 CRL.M.C. 3340/2026 Page 3 of 3 11. Accordingly, case FIR No. 0124/2019 dated 16.08.2019 registered under section 289 of the IPC at P.S.: Chitranjan Park, South (Delhi) is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed. 12. Petition stands disposed-of. 13. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 30, 2026 V.Rawat This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/05/2026 at 11:43:57