Jogarabeevi v. The State Represented by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prison
WP Crl./890/2026 · 2026-06-29
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 40639 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 40639 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl. No. 890 of 2026 __________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP Crl. No. 890 of 2026 Jogarabeevi W/o.Abusali, No. 3/24, Main Road, Valuthur, Thanjavur 614210. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Represented by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prison Vellore Range, Vellore - 632 002. 2. The Superintendent Central Prison, Cuddalore 607 004. ..Respondent(s) PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with impugned order dt. 17.09.2025 in proceedings No. 1494545/Tha.Ku.2/2025 passed by 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 28 days without escort to the detenue, Mubarak S/o.Abusali aged about 30 years bearing PID No. 34470 confined at Central Prison, Cuddalore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 890 of 2026 __________ For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Sadhana For Respondent(s): Mr. C.R. Malarvannan Counsel for Government Of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The mother of the convict, viz., Mubarak S/o.Abusali aged about 30 years, has filed this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 17.09.2025, by which the petitioner’s request for ordinary leave for the convict has been rejected in terms of Rule 22(3) of Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982, since the convict has not completed one year from the date on which he had returned from the earlier leave i.e., on 24.06.2025. 2. We do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. 3. The impugned order was passed on 17.09.2025 and as on date, one year has elapsed from the convict’s return to jail after his earlier leave. Therefore, the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner’s request in the light of the above changed circumstances and pass https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 890 of 2026 __________ appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The writ petition is closed with the above directions. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ars To
1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison Vellore Range, Vellore - 632 002. 2. The Superintendent Central Prison, Cuddalore 607 004. 3.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 890 of 2026 __________ DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. ars WP Crl. No. 890 of 2026 29-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis