Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4063 (ALL)

MAHENDRA KUMAR CHAUDHARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 54 OTHERS

WRIC/17935/2026 · 2026-05-06

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17935 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 10.04.2026 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Phoolpur, Prayagraj (Annexure No.2), during the pendency of present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing appeal against the order impugned. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. 6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. May 7, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Mishra, Girja Shanker Mishra, Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Mahendra Kumar Chaudhari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 54 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad