Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4062 (AP)

M ATCHUTARAMA GANDHI, VISAKHAPATNAM & 3 OTHERS v. SMT. C SAVITHRI, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST

CRP/1562/2017 · 2026-06-23

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 24.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010280042017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1562/2017 Between: 1. M ATCHUTARAMA GANDHI, VISAKHAPATNAM & 3 OTHERS, S/O. SANNAYYA PATRUDUGARU, EMPLOYEE, AGED 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT 6-42 IN SHANTHI NAGAR, CHINAMUSHIDIVADA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. MAJJI SAILAJA, W/O. ATCHUTARAMA GANDHI, PRESENTLY HOUSEWIFE, HINDU, AGED 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT 6-42 IN SHANTHI NAGAR, CHINAMUSHIDIVADA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. MAJJI SANNAYYA PATRUDU, S/O. ATCHUTARAMA GANDHI, EMPLOYEE, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT 6-42 IN SHANTHI NAGAR, CHINAMUSHIDIVADA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. M.V.V.N. PATRUDU, S/O. ATCHUTARAMA GANDHI, EMPLOYEE, HINDU, AGED 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT 6-42 IN SHANTHI NAGAR, CHINAMUSHIDIVADA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SMT C SAVITHRI VISAKHAPATNAM DIST, W/o. Krishna Rao garu, aged about 58 years, R/o. Shanthi Nagar, Chinamushidivada, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...RESPONDENT 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the order and decree dated 1.9.2016 passed in I.A. No. 884 of 2016 in I.A. No. 922 of 2015 in O.S. No. 429 of 2011 by the Learned Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 2063 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of further proceedings in O.S.No. 429 of 2011, on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, pending final disposal of the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1562 of 2017 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. A. Swathi Bhavani, learned counsel representing Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the Civil Revision Petition no longer survives for adjudication and that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 24th June, 2026 cbn Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non reportable 4 184 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.R.P.No.1562 of 2017 24th June, 2026 cbn