Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40585 (CAL)

POULAMI GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/23089/2026 · 2026-09-15

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16. 16. 15.09.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 23089 OF 2026 POULAMI GHOSH VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Suvom Dutta, Adv. Mr. P. Roy, Adv. …For Petitioner Mr. Srijit Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Aditya Mondal, Adv. …For State Mr. Nirmalendu Bera, Adv. Ms. Tanima Nandy, Adv. …For Private Respondents 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. Matter is heard in presence of learned advocates representing petitioner, State respondents and private respondents. 3. Learned advocate representing petitioner submits that after filing of this writ petition on 25th August, 2026 FIR was registered being Kotwali P.S. Case no.932/ 2026 dated 28th August, 2026. 4. In view of registration of FIR grievance of the petitioner appears to have been redressed. Hence, no further order need be passed on this writ petition. 5. Writ petition stands disposed of with a liberty granted to petitioner to approach jurisdictional Magistrate, if so advised. 6. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)