Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40576 (CAL)

PIYA SENGUPTA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/12185/2026 · 2026-09-16

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01 Ranajit (AR.CT) 16.09.2026 Ct.05 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. NO 12185 OF 2026 Piya Sengupta -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Chunky Agarwal, Mr. Akshay Kumar Jain Sukhani ….for the petitioner. Mr. Suraj Mishra ….for the State. 1. Matter is accommodated in today’s list under the heading “To Be Mentioned” on being mentioned by learned advocate representing the petitioner. 2. At the time of call learned advocate representing petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter and in support of same an email letter dated 14th August, 2026 is placed before this Court and same is taken on record. 3. However, State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 4. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)