PRATAP CHANDRA v. SHRI RAHUL SINGH I, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 14
CAPL/2174/2026 · 2026-05-06
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4057 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4057 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2174 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Instructions have come from the side opposite which are taken on record.
2. From the instructions sent by the officer concerned, it is clear that the order of writ Court has been complied with as appeal in question has been decided on 21.4.2026.
3. As the order of writ Court has been complied with by the opposite party, no case for contempt is made out. Contempt application stands dismissed. Contempt notice stands discharged.
4. Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party. May 7, 2026 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upadhyay Karan Dinanath, Vishesh Rajvanshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Pratap Chandra .....Applicant(s) Shri Rahul Singh I, Additional District Judge 14 .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad