Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4056 (UTT)

AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/271/2026 · 2026-03-20

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 271 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. None for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned AGA for the State on instructions, apprised to this Court that now, there is threat perception to the petitioners and they have been advised by the SHO concerned, if they get any threat call, they can approach to him. 4. In view of the above statement, present writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 20.03.2026 SKS