Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010488652022 NC: 2026:KHC:50678 MFA No. 7282 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7282 OF 2022 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
1. VENKATESH (MENTIONED IN CLAIM PETITION AS B VENKATESH @ CHINNA B VENKATESH) S/O LATE SRI BABU, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.30 BYATARAYANAPURA IST MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, NEW EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560 026
2. B SHANKARAPPA S/O LATE BABU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.30, "A" ROAD,
"V" MAIN, NEW LAYOUT, BYATARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560 026 …APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. B.R.SRINIVASA GOWDA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. BALAKRISHNA V S/O LATE B VENKATESH, MAJOR
Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010488652022 NC: 2026:KHC:50678 MFA No. 7282 of 2022
2. HANUMANTHARAYA S/O LATE B VENKATESH MAJOR
3. V.ANANDA S/O LATE B VENKATESH MAJOR
4. V VENKATESH S/O LATE B VENKATESH MAJOR
5. V JAGADISH S/O LATE B VENKATESH MAJOR
6. SMT.THIMMAKKA S/O LATE B VENKATESH MAJOR
RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 6 ARE R/AT NO.134/3, III CROSS ROAD CHAMARAJPET BENGALURU-560 018
7. 7(a)
7(b)
7 (c)
SOMASHEKAR V S/O LATE AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS. SMT.CHANDRAKALA, W/O LATE SOMASHEKAR V AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
VINOD KUMAR S S/O LATE SOMASHEKAR V AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
BHAVYA S S/O LATE SOMASHEKAR V
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010488652022 NC: 2026:KHC:50678 MFA No. 7282 of 2022
7 (d)
7 (e)
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS BALARAJ S S/O LATE SOMASHEKAR V AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
LAVANYA S S/O LATE SOMASHEKAR V AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
RESPONDENT NOS. 7 (d) and 7 (e) ARE MINORS , REPRENSENTED BY THEIR MOTHER CHANDRAKALA
ALL ARE R/AT NO.176, IST F CROSS, 7TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD STAGE, 4TH BLOCK, BASAVESHWARA NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 079
8. GOPALAKRISHNA S/O LATE B VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
9. SRINIVASA V AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE B VENKATESH,
10. V JAGADISH, S/O LATE B VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
11. V DEVARAJ S/O LATE B VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
ALL ARE SONS OF B VENKATESH R/AT NO.54, III CROSS III MAIN , VI BLOCK PADARAYANAPURA BENGALURU - 560 026
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010488652022 NC: 2026:KHC:50678 MFA No. 7282 of 2022
12.
SUJATHA KUMARI V D/O B V VENKATESH, W/O M S KODANDARAM, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.250, 4TH MAIN, IST STAGE, 5TH PHASE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, MAHAGANAPATHI NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 044
13. SMT.V.BHAGYAMMA W/O G OBALAPPA, D/O LATE B VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.280, 17TH CROSS AND MAIN, DEVARAJ URS NAGAR, OLD GUDDEDAHALLI MYSORE MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 026
14. SMT.V.PARVATHI W/O G OBALAPPA, D/O LATE B VENKATESH R/AT NO.280 17TH CROSS AND MAIN DEVARAJ URS NAGAR OLD GUDDEDAHALLI MYSORE MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560 026
15. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER B.D.A KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020
16. THE COMMISSIONER B.D.A KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560020 …RESPONDENTS
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010488652022 NC: 2026:KHC:50678 MFA No. 7282 of 2022
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.07.07.2022 PASSED IN LAC NO.192/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
ORAL JUDGMENT
When the matter is called out in the post-lunch session once again for the second time at 02.46 p.m., there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
2. This Court, vide order dated 16.06.2026, at the instance of the appellants on the applications-I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 filed to recall the order dated 19.06.2023 and to condone the delay, allowed the applications and restored this appeal to file, which was dismissed for non-prosecution, subject to payment of cost of Rs.5.000/- to be paid within two weeks of the said order.
4.
Learned counsel for the appellants has been taking time to deposit cost.
- 6 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010488652022 NC: 2026:KHC:50678 MFA No. 7282 of 2022
5. Even on the previous date of hearing on 09.09.2026, there was no representation. This Court passed an
order providing another opportunity to be listed today to facilitate the appellants to make good the cost and proceed further in the case as it was already dismissed for non- prosecution and it was restored subject to payment of cost. It appears that the appellants are not interested neither they have deposited cost nor appeared on the last date of hearing or for that matter today.
6. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2