14.09.2026 Court No.35 Item No.172 ssi CRM (A) 2651 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Belgharia Police Station Case No.439 of 2025 dated 21.12.2025 under Sections 85/108/316(2) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Tarasankar Giri. …. Petitioner. Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee Mr. Akashdeep Mukherjee Mr. Soummyadeep Nag Mr. Nasrin Nahar …for the petitioner Mr. Shourjyo Mukherjee Ms. Supriti Sarkhel ..for the State Mr. Akash Sarkar …for the de facto Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband who has been foisted with the present criminal case after almost five months of the incident. Learned advocates appearing for the de facto complainant and the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that it was because of a video recording which surfaced and was received by the de facto complainant, the present case was initiated. Materials also reflect that such video at the relevant point of time was sent to the husband also who did not take proper steps. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary, a case for investigation definitely have been made out, but custodial interrogation of the present petitioner is not required in this case. 2 Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner viz., Tarasankar Giri shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner shall report to the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days from date and thereafter on all subsequent dates fixed by the Investigating Officer, if required for the sake of investigation, till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Court. Memo of evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 2651 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)