Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40528 (CAL)

SAIKAT ROY v. SANGHAMITRA SARKAR

CO/3070/2026 · 2026-09-14

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 14.09.2026 (AD 15) (S. Banerjee) CO 3070 of 2026 Saikat Roy Vs. Sanghamtira Sarkar Mr. Baidurya Ghosal Mr. Saikat Mukherjee …for the petitioner On the prayer of the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, leave is granted to the learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner to amend the cause-title of the civil revision application here and now. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court at Uluberia, Howrah to dispose of Matrimonial Suit no. 219 of 2020 expeditiously. From the order-sheets appended to this civil revision application this Court finds that January 7, 2027 has been fixed for further cross-examination of OPW-1 as a last chance. On a query of the Court learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that no application for alimony pendente lite has been filed by 2 the wife/opposite-party as she has independent income by her own. In the light of the aforesaid submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, this revisional application stands disposed of by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court at Uluberia, Howrah to make an endeavour to dispose of Matrimonial Suit No. 219 of 2020 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, provided that the petitioner is not in default in payment of any amount directed by the Court on account of maintenance or alimony pendente lite or litigation expenses. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)