Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010558542026 NC: 2026:KHC:50596 WP No. 25338 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.25338 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. JAMPANNA DEAD BY HIS LRS. KATAPPA S/O. LATE JAMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT HUCHANGI PURA VILLAGE, JAGALURU TALUK - 577528. CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 2. KARIYAMMA, D/O LATE JAMPANNA, W/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O AITHOL KURUBARA HATTI VILLAGE, CHITRADURGA TALUK - 577501. 3. JAYAPPA, S/O. LATE JAMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT HUCHANGI PURA VILLAGE, JAGALURU TALUK, 577528 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 4. NAGAMMA, D/O LATE JAMPANNA, W/O SHIVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT. HUCHANGI PURA VILLAGE, JAGALURU TALUK-577528,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010558542026 NC: 2026:KHC:50596 WP No. 25338 of 2026
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 5. PANJAPPA, S/O. LATE JAMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT. HUCHANGI PURA VILLAGE, JAGALURU TALUK - 577528 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KANTHARAJAPPA M.G., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE TAHSILDAR THE TAHSILDAR OFFICE, JAGALURU TALUK. JAGALURU-577528. 2. DEVENDRAPPA, S/O LATE PANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O HUCHANGI PURA VILLAGE, JAGALURU TALUK-577528 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 3. MINAKSHAMMA W/O DEVENDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O HUCHANGI PURA VILLAGE, JAGALURU TALUK - 577528 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010558542026 NC: 2026:KHC:50596 WP No. 25338 of 2026
QUASH THE ORDER IN RRT VIVADA.CR.20/2015-16 DATED 17/08/2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for Respondent No. 1. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 17.08.2015 passed by Respondent No. 1-Tahasildar, vide Annexure-B.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. In view of the above, the petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy under Section
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010558542026 NC: 2026:KHC:50596 WP No. 25338 of 2026
136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Hence, the writ petition is not maintainable. 5.
Accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority and avail the remedy available under law, the writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22