NIZAMUDDIN S/O SHRI SAIFUDDIN, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CCP/397/2024 · 2026-03-28
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4052 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4052 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13105] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 397/2024
1. Nizamuddin S/o Shri Saifuddin, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of 3-E-16, Talvandi, Kota (Raj.).
2. Mustafa Hussain S/o Shri Gulam Hussain, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of House No. 2-D-67, Chatrapura Talab, Vigyan Nagar, Kota (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Technical Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Shri P.c. Kishan, Principal Secretary, Technical Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Shri N.k. Gupta, Director, Directorate Of Technical Education, W-6, Residency Road, Jodhpur.
4. Shri Kumar Pal Gautam, Commissioner, Employment And Entrepreneurship Department, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur-302004(Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Illyas Khan, Adv. for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samee Khan, AAAG & Ms. Sunita Meena, Asstt. GC for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 28/03/2026
1. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging non compliance of order dated 25.07.2022, whereby the writ petition was disposed of in the light of Division Bench
judgment in the case of Shyam Lal Tailor Vs. State of Rajasthan (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1025/2020) and
[2026:RJ-JP:13105] (2 of 2) [CCP-397/2024] consequently, petitioner was held entitled for selection grade from the date of first appointment.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have filed reply to the contempt petition, wherein it has been stated that the order dated 25.07.2022 passed by this Court has already been complied with vide order dated
21.08.2024.
3. There is no rejoinder to the reply.
4. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the respondents and on the basis of reply, no case of deliberate and willful disobedience is made out.
5. The Contempt Petition filed by the petitioners is dismissed.
6. Notices stand discharged.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /47