CRWP-2936 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 HARSHITA STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to the respondent 2. the petitione P-3) before the respondent No. stipulated time. 3. 2936-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH HARSHITA & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the respondents No.4 to 8. PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to respondents No.4 to 8. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioners have filed the representation dated ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2936-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 16.03.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the respondents No.4 to 8. as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 12.03.2026 (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a (O&M) .2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for the respondents No.4 to 8. for from submits that (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a GAURAV THAKUR 2026.03.17 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2936 on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State. State is hereby dispensed with. 5. of the respondents No.4 on record. 6. hereby disposed of with a direction to representation within a period of 15 days from is further security to that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre perception to the petitioner authority of assessment the issue of Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether 2936-2026 (O&M) 8587 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State. is hereby dispensed with. Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents No.4 to 8 and filed Power of Attorney. The same be taken on record. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order further directed that the petitioners shall security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre perception to the petitioners or the validity of their authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to assessment of the threat perception to the petitioner the issue of providing adequate security to Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appears on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3/State. Hence service of notice upon the Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf to 8 and filed Power of Attorney. The same be taken Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order the date of receipt of copy of instant order shall be provided requisite safety and life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to thre or the validity of their relationship. The police District shall be at liberty to make an independent to the petitioners, and take a decision security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No appears upon the Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf to 8 and filed Power of Attorney. The same be taken Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is decide the by passing a speaking order the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It safety and clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat . The police independent and take a decision on GAURAV THAKUR 2026.03.17 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document