Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4050 (BOM)

BALASAHEB MURLIDHAR AAHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

REVN/51/2026 · 2026-08-24

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

51.26revn (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 49 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2026 BALASAHEB MURLIDHAR AAHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ….. Mr V. S. Janephalkar, Advocate for Applicant Ms B. B. Gunjal, APP for Respondent No.1/State ….. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2026 P. C. : 1. Learned Advocate Mr Janephalkar for the applicant, at the outset, submits that inadvertently, instead of criminal appeal before the learned Sessions Court, this criminal revision application was filed. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw this revision application with liberty to prefer appeal before the learned Sessions Court. He further submits that the time spent by him in pursuing this criminal revision application before this Court may be directed to be condoned under the provisions of Limitation Act. 2. In view of the above, this criminal revision application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as is prayed for. 2026:BHC-AUG:38407 51.26revn (2) 3. It is made clear that the time spent by the revision applicant in pursuing this criminal revision application shall be considered by the learned Sessions Court, if the question of delay arises. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk