[2026:RJ-JP:11297] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1933/2026 1. Namonarayan Meena S/o Jagdish Meena 2. Feliram Meena S/o Jagdish Meena Both Residents of Village Ghata, Tehsil Bassi, P.S. Kanota, District Jaipur. (Accused Petitioners Confined At Central Jail Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 17/03/2026 1. The accused-petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 300/2025 registered at Police Station Bassi, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 4, 5, 6 of Explosive Substances Act and under Sections 288, 61(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long time. He further submits that no recovery has been effected from the accused-petitioners. He further submits that co-accused persons namely Narsingh Lal Salvi @ Naresh, Ishwar Singh, Ramjilal and Krishna Kumar Meena have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 23.01.2026 in [2026:RJ-JP:11297] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1933/2026] S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1198/2026, 19.12.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16031/2025 and 25.06.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous bail Application No. 8034/2025 and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there is one another criminal antecedent against the accused-petitioners. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties that the co-accused persons namely Narsingh Lal Salvi @ Naresh, Ishwar Singh, Ramjilal and Krishna Kumar Meena have already been enlarged on bail. No recovery has been effected from the accused-petitioners and trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Namonarayan Meena S/o Jagdish Meena and Feliram Meena S/o Jagdish Meena are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is [2026:RJ-JP:11297] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1933/2026] transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the afore-mentioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner(s) for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH/81