P a g e 1 | 2 Item No. 7-8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL CRP(C.R.P. Art. 227) No. 13 of 2026 Maibam Ranjit Singh & Anr. … Petitioners - Versus - Sarungbam Dwijendra Singh … Respondent With MC[CRP(C.R.P. Art. 227)] No. 24 of 2026 B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR O R D E R 13.05.2026 [1] When the matter was taken up, it came to light that certain documents which are extremely relevant nay imperative have not been filed. [2] Faced with the above situation, Mr. H. Dijen, learned counsel for revision petitioner made a further plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the revision petitioner to file a CRP afresh after including all relevant materials particularly ex-parte decree dated 19.11.2016 besides written statement dated 29.09.2015 filed by the defendant who KHOIROM BIPINCHAN DRA SINGH Digitally signed by KHOIROM BIPINCHANDRA SINGH Date: 2026.05.13 07:11:34 +05'30' P a g e 2 | 2 filed the application to set aside the ex-parte decree. A scanned reproduction of endorsement made by the revision petitioner in this regard in the case file is as follows: [3] In the narrative thus far, captioned CRP is disposed of as closed albeit with preservation of rights and contentions of the revision petitioner in the aforesaid manner as well as observations as set out supra. There shall be no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE Bipin