Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010291292023 NC: 2026:KHC:49067 RFA No. 1178 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1178 OF 2023 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. SHIVANNA, S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
2. JUNJAMMA W/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
APPELLANTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT: LINGANAHALLI VILLAGE BELLAVI HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK PIN – 572 107. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH T M AND SRI. BASAVARAJU L, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. SHARADAMMA, W/O LATE RAMANNA @ RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
2. NINGAMMA D/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
3. KEMPAIAH S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
4.
CHAITRA D/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
Digitally signed by MADHURI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010291292023 NC: 2026:KHC:49067 RFA No. 1178 of 2023
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT: HUNASEKATTE VILLAGE BUKKAPATANA HOBLI SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT PIN – 572 115.
5.
G M HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE MUDLAIAH AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
6.
H NATARAJU S/O G M HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R5 AND R6 ARE RESIDING AT:
P.GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE SOREKUNTE POST, BELLAVI HOBLI TUMAKURU TALUK PIN – 572 128.
7.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICE KIADB, MARUTHI TOWER NEAR SIT COLLEGE SIT MAIN ROAD, B H ROAD TUMAKURU CITY – 572 103. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.03.2023 PASSED IN OS.NO.331/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010291292023 NC: 2026:KHC:49067 RFA No. 1178 of 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo to withdraw the appeal, which reads as under:
“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The undersigned counsel for the appellants most respectfully submit that, as instructed by the appellants, since during the pendency of the above appeal, the parties have amicably settled the dispute between themselves out of Court, voluntarily and with their free consent. That in view of the said settlement, the Appellants does not wish to prosecute the above appeal any further.
WHEREFORE, the Appellants most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellants to withdraw the above appeal and dismiss the same as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Accepting the said memo and submission of learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
SMJ; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4