Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40478 (KAR)

MANJULA V v. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE STATIUON HOUSE OFFICER

CRL.P/10574/2024 · 2026-09-15

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010494362024 NC: 2026:KHC:50227 CRL.P No. 10574 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10574 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MANJULA V W/O DODDANNA .C AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 2. KUMARA P S/O PATALAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 3. YOGESH V S/O VENKATA CHALAPATHY AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS 4. MANU @ MANOJ S/O NARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 5. SANDEEP S/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT KADUSONNAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, KANNUR POST, BENGALURU - 562 149 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LOKESHA M.Y, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010494362024 NC: 2026:KHC:50227 CRL.P No. 10574 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER BENGALURU POLICE STATION BENGALURU - 562149 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS HIGH COURT BENGALURU- 01 2. SMT ARUNA W/O RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT KADUSONNAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLIL HOBLI, KANNUR POST, BENGALURU - 562 149 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAVEED S, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.51/2022 NOW PENDING AS CC.NO.3430/2023, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143,147,148,448,354,323,324,506 R/W 149 OF IPC, AT ANNEXURE-A, PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT DEVANAHALLI AGAINST THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010494362024 NC: 2026:KHC:50227 CRL.P No. 10574 of 2024 2. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 02.12.2024. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process fee. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since two years. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. 3. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/-. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11