Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40443 (KAR)

SRI S SUKUMAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/28767/2023 · 2026-09-15

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010661742023 NC: 2026:KHC:50204 WP No. 28767 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 28767 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. S. SUKUMAR S/O LATE V. SHANMUGAN, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 338 V.O.C STREET, JOTINAKAR, KALPATTIU, KALPATTU, TIRUVALLUR, TAMILNADU - 601 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL K.N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VIJAYANAGARA POLICE STATION, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040 REPRESENTED BY SPP AT HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010661742023 NC: 2026:KHC:50204 WP No. 28767 of 2023 2. SMT. M. LAKSHMI PRIYA D/O LATE C.R. MUTHU SWAMY, W/O B. CHANDRA SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING MENITONED AS NO. 2373/L, 3RD B MAIN ROAD, RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. DHARMAPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 482 OF THE CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN XXIV TH ACMM AT BANGALORE IN CR NO. 0399/2014 DTD. 16.09.2014 ORDERED BY VIJAYANAGAR POLICE STATION U/S 120B, 326, 327, 420, 506(B) RWS 34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONER AS PER ANX-A IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER CONCERN AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010661742023 NC: 2026:KHC:50204 WP No. 28767 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Writ Petition came to be filed on 11.12.2023. Till today office objections are not complied. Taking note of the same, petition stand dismissed for non prosecution. However dismissal of the present petition shall not come in the way of the petitioner pursuing the remedy if the cause survives for further consideration. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12