Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40440 (MAD)

M/s.Sri Ganesha Granites v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC)

WP/21670/2026 · 2026-06-23

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21670 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21670 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.23465 & 23467 of 2026 M/s.Sri Ganesha Granites (Represented by its proprietor Nathuram Jat Balvirsingh), 2/642, Achamangalam Road, G.Nagamangalam, Jagadevipalayam, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu 635 203. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Krishnagiri-II Assessment Circle, Krishnagiri. ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the Respondent herein in Form GST DRC 07 vide Ref No. ZD331125053866C, along with its detailed order both dated 04.11.2025, for the year 2021-22, quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr. K.A.Parthasarathy For Respondent: Ms. G. Dhana Madhri Government Counsel (Tax) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21670 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 04.11.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms. G. Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some recoveries were made pursuant to the impugned order. This aspect is required to be verified and confirmed. Subject to adjustment thereof against the tax dues, he submits that the petitioner would pay 25% of the tax demand in the aggregate. An endorsement has been made on the bundle to that effect. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits an additional amount towards the disputed tax demand, as agreed to so as to remit 25% in the aggregate after giving credit to sums recovered earlier, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside. Consequently, the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21670 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 23-06-2026 Index : Yes/No (3/4) Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Krishnagiri-II Assessment Circle, Krishnagiri. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21670 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 21670 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.23465 & 23467 of 2026 23-06-2026 (3/4) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis