2026:HHC:6355 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 1886 of 2026 Decided on : 09.03.2026 Smt. Madhu Bala …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of subsequent developments, the petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, having become infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:6355 any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 09, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)