CHANDRA PRAKASH AHARI S/O SHRI SHYAM LAL AHARI, v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1586/2026 · 2026-02-23
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4043 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4043 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:8110] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1586/2026 Chandra Prakash Ahari S/o Shri Shyam Lal Ahari, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Kamal Bhawan, New Colony, Rani Road, Opp. Fatah Tower Taxi Stand, Kherwara, District Udaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Employee Selection Board, Jaipur Through Chairman State Agriculture Management Institution Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.)
4. National Council For Teacher Education, Through Its Director, Hans Bhawan, Wing-Ii, Bahadur Sah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 23/02/2026
1. Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s).
2.
Learned counsel has submitted that controversy involved in this case is squarely covered by the judgment of Division Bench of this Court dated 27.11.2025 passed in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.152/2023 (Bimala Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) and on the basis of judgment of Division Bench, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has also disposed
[2026:RJ-JP:8110] (2 of 2) [CW-1586/2026] of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20212/2025 (Vijay Shankar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) vide order dated
19.12.2025.
3. This fact has also not been disputed by learned counsel for the respondents.
4. In view of above consensus between learned counsels for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with the same directions as given in the case of Bimala Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan (Supra).
5. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /20