Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40424 (KAR)

MRS VIJAYAMMA v. MRS SHANTHAMMA

CRL.P/5505/2019 · 2026-09-15

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403622019 NC: 2026:KHC:50299 CRL.P No. 5505 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5505 OF 2019 BETWEEN: MRS. VIJAYAMMA W/O MR MUNISHAMI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT 2ND ‘A’ CROSS NEAR DURGA DEVI TEMPLE V V EXTESNION, HOSKOTE BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 114 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DR.S.ARUMUGHAM, ADVOCATE) AND: MRS. SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE MR. PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O 2ND CROSS GANGAMMAGUDI ROAD M V EXTENSION, HOSKOTE BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 114 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI A YOGASREE, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED 05.10.2013 ANNEXURE-B AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AT ANNEXURE-A IN Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403622019 NC: 2026:KHC:50299 CRL.P No. 5505 of 2019 C.C.NO.1243/2013 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., HOSAKOTE AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. This petition is of the year 2019 and the counsel for the petitioner is not pursuing the matter diligently. The relief is sought to quash the complaint dated 05.10.2013 and the entire proceedings in C.C.No.1243/2013 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Hoskote and also for challenging of taking cognizance for the said offence. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that already trial has been commenced and complainant has been cross examined partly. The counsel for the respondent also submits that did not cross examine the witness in entirety and accused also absent and NBW was also issued. In view of taking of cognizance and already trial has been commenced and PW1 was partly cross examined, the question of - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010403622019 NC: 2026:KHC:50299 CRL.P No. 5505 of 2019 considering the taking of cognizance does not arise. Hence, the petition becomes infructuous. The counsel for the petitioner also not pursuing the matter diligently. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN