Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010186212022 NC: 2026:KHC:50453 WP No. 8681 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 8681 OF 2022 (SC/ST) BETWEEN:
SRI. KARIYAPPA, S/O. LATE TALYADA HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT DEVAPURA VILLAGE, MADADAKERE HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577527. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PARINEETA S. CHANAL, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA-577201.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DAVANAGERE SUB-DIVISION, DAVANAGERE-577201
3. D.H.RUDRAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
SMT. DRAKSHYANAMMA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS (AMENDED CAUSE TITLE CARRIED OUT AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 01.08.2023)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010186212022 NC: 2026:KHC:50453 WP No. 8681 of 2022
4.
SRI. R.PRAKASH, S/O. LATE RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
5.
SMT. SUMITHRA, D/O. LATE RUDRAPPA, W/O. E.MALLIKARJUNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.4 AND 5 ARE R/AT DEVAPURA VILLAGE, MADADAKERE HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577527. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VISHNU HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5;
VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 01.08.2023, R4 AND R5 ARE LRS OF DECEASED R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010186212022 NC: 2026:KHC:50453 WP No. 8681 of 2022
The petition was listed on 15.09.2026. On that day also, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner and hence, it was ordered to be listed today i.e., 16.09.2026 and it was also ordered that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution.
As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7