Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4041 (RAJ)

HANUMAN SAHAY MEENA S/O BHAGWAN SAHAY MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6696/2026 · 2026-04-13

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15355] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6638/2026 Naveen Son of Krishan Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of 321, Ward No 4, Na, Tajnagar, Tajnagar (30), Gurgaon, Haryana 122506. Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 55 Al 2816 And Hr 55 At 2470. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Transport Department of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror (Rajasthan). 5. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). 6. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Sikar, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 7. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Jaipur First. District Jaipur (Rajasthan). 8. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Jaipur Second, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). 9. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 10. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Bundi, District Bundi. 11. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Dausa, District Dausa. 12. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Kota, District Kota. 13. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Tonk, District Tonk. 14. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Bhilwara, District Bhilwara. 15. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Shahpura, District Bhilwara. [2026:RJ-JP:15355] (2 of 3) [CW-6638/2026] 16. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Kekri, District Kekri. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6696/2026 1. Hanuman Sahay Meena S/o Bhagwan Sahay Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Dhani Bandolav Teh Lawan District Dausa Rj 303004 Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj40Ga1801 2. Rohan Contraction, Through Proprietor Munafed S/o Aas Mohmmad, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 29 Mukhye Aabadi Arandka Tijara Alwar Rj 301411, Owner Of 2 Vehicles Registration No. 1. Rj40Ga6446 2. Rj40Ga6343 3. Tahir S/o Subhan, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Salwadi Bharatpur Rj 321204, Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj29Gb2845 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5. District Transport Officer, Dto Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 6. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Alwar, Rajasthan. 7. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. District Transport Officer, Dto Bhiwari, Rajasthan. 9. District Transport Officer, Dto Rajsamand, Rajasthan. 10. District Transport Officer, Dto Kotputli, Rajasthan. 11. District Transport Officer, Dto Dausa, Rajasthan. 12. District Transport Officer, Dto Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:15355] (3 of 3) [CW-6638/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Khandelwal Mr. Mritunjya Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the matter at hand is no more res integra and that the issue involved herein are squarely covered by the order dated 08.04.2026 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6315/2026 titled Atul Gupta & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the present petition but is not able to refute the aforesaid submissions. 3. In light of the foregoing facts and circumstance, this Court is of view to dispose of the present petitions in light of the ratio encapsulated by this Court in Atul Gupta (supra). 4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of Pending applications, if any, shall also stand(s) disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/14 & 17