Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4041 (CHH)

GANGADHAR v. VIMAL KUMAR JAIN

SA/524/2018 · 2026-04-01

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15366 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 524 of 2018 1 - Gangadhar S/o S/o Bhukhan Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Tatkela Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Virendra Kumar S/o S/o Damarudhar Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Tatkela Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Lilawati W/o R/o Village Tatkela Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Vimal Kumar Jain S/o S/o Sohan Lal Jain Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Bagicha Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Nilmani S/o S/o Renuram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Ambatoli, Bhighara, Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.04.02 16:10:13 +0530 2 3 - Smt. Vishakha W/o W/o Bihari R/o Village Garabahar, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Hemo Bai D/o D/o Damarudhar R/o Village Tatkela, Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Vinod Kumar Bhagat D/o S/o Fituram R/o Village Kurumkela, Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chhattisgarh Government Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Appellants : None For Respondent(s) : Shri Lekhram Dhruv, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 02.04.2026 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the appellants to press this appeal on repeated calls. 3 2. In view of the above, it appears that the appellants have lost interest in pursuing the present matter. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib