[2026:JHHC:2499] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. no. 2666 of 2025 Geetanajli Pandey, Aged about 34 years, D/o Ramakant Pandey, R/o Sector 4/F, Quarter No. 3110, Near Apna Bazar, P.O. & P.S. Sector 4, Bokaro Steel City, District - Bokaro, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Babli, W/o- Asfaq Rejaul, 3. Asfaq Rejaul, S/ Not Known, both are R/o village - Chhatabad, Near Kashish Beauty Parlour, Katras, P.O. + P.S. Katras, District Bokaro, Jharkhand … Opp. parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhav Prasad ,Adv. For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. PP For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Atif Anwar ,Adv. 03 / 30.01.2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioners for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 822 of 2024 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Cr.M.P. No. 822 of 2024 was dismissed vide order dated 17.06.2025 for non- compliance of the order of removing the defects within the peremptory period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to the inadvertence, the petitioner could not comply the said order in time which resulted in dismissal of Cr.M.P. No. 822 of 2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in this case and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No. 822 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 submits that the opposite party no. 2 has been harassed by the petitioner by delaying the matter, hence, the opposite party no. 2 be compensated adequately in terms of cost. Considering the aforesaid facts, Cr.M.P. No. 822 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- by the petitioner to the opposite party no. 2 through his counsel appearing in the record within four weeks and filing the proof of the same within that period, failing which, this conditional order shall not be given effect to and this criminal miscellaneous petition shall remain dismissed without further reference to the Bench. In case, the petitioner files the proof of payment of Rs. 1,000/- to the opposite party no. 2 through learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 appearing in the record, then Cr.M.P. No. 822 of 2024 be restored to its original file and Cr.M.P. No. 822 of 2024 be listed after a week of the said payment. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 30.01.2026 Smita/-