Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40394 (CAL)

AMIT PRABHAKAR KORE AND ORS v. PARTHO SARATHI ADDYA

CRR/2112/2023 · 2026-09-14

Ajay Kumar Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.09.2026 Item no. 29 Court No. 39 AN IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION CRR 2112 of 2023 Amit Prabhakar Kore & Ors. VS Partho Sarathi Adda Mr. Anirban Dutta Mr. Saudull Abedin Ms. Pooja Singh Mr. Younus Sultan … for the opposite party 1. None appears on behalf of either of the petitioner on call nor any accommodation has either been sought for. 2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners in earlier occasion also. 3. The opposite party is represented. 4. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case anymore. 5. In view of the above, the instant revisional application stands dismissed for default. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 7. Connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. 9. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)