- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010229102023 NC: 2026:KHC:50021 MFA No. 2862 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2862 OF 2023 (CPC) BETWEEN: MR. SHIVA PRASAD B.S., PUTTUR S/O. LATE SUBRAHMANYA BHAT B., AGE 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.302, 3RD FLOOR, PIONEER PALACE, 6TH CROSS, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 056. PRESENTLY R/AT NO.90, 3RD CROSS, VENKATAPPA LAYOUT, AMRUTHAHALLI, SAHAKAR NAGAR POST, BENGAULRU - 560 092. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRASANNA V.R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. GEETHA H. SINGH W/O. HARI SINGH B., AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT. NO. A 101, TOWER 4, GODREJ WOODSMAN ESTATE, HEBBAL, BENGALURU - 24. 2. SMT. PARVATHAMMA, W/O. VENKATAREDDY,. Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010229102023 NC: 2026:KHC:50021 MFA No. 2862 of 2023 AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.60, 3RD CROSS, SONNAPPA LAYOUT, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 24. 3. MR. VENKATAREDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT NO.60, 3RD CROSS, SONNAPPA LAYOUT, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 24. 4. MR. MAHESH, S/O. V. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.60, 3RD CROSS, SONNAPPA LAYOUT, BHUVENSHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 24. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.K. MALIKARJUN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A. SAMPATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MANJUNATH R.P, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.03.2023 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN OS.NO. 5880/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE XII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-27, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010229102023 NC: 2026:KHC:50021 MFA No. 2862 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsels for the parties are present. 2. Both learned counsels submit that the suit has been settled before the Lok Adalat and therefore, the present appeal does not survive for consideration. 3. In view of the settlement, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory application, if any, does not survive for consideration and the same pales into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30