Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4038 (JHR)

VEGETABLE GROWERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,THROUGH ITS SECRETARY NAMELY SRI DILIP ORAON v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY,GOVT.OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1839/2026 · 2026-03-24

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8306 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1839 of 2026 ------ Vegetable Growers Cooperative Society Ltd. through Secretary namely Sri Dilip Oraon, having its office at Budhu Lane, Koiri Mohalla, P.O. & P.S. & District - Lohardaga. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building P.S Dhurwa, P.O- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 2. Jharkhand State Building Construction Department through its Secretary., having its office at Project Building, PS Jagarnathpur P.O. Dhurwa, District - Ranchi. 3. Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Ltd through its Executive Director., having its office at Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., 3rd Floor, JSBCCL Building Project Bhawan Campus, Beside Jharkhand Mantralaya P.O- Dhurwa, District - Ranchi 4. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jharkhand, having its office at Pashupalan Bhawan, Hesag, P.O. & P.S. District - Ranchi. Hatia 5. Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga, P.O. & P.S. Lohardaga, District - Lohardaga. 6. The Manager-cum-Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Limited, Project Implantation Unit, having its office at Lohardaga, P.O. & PS Lohardaga, District - Lohardaga. 7. M/s. Bathwal Tradecom Pvt. Ltd. through its Director, having its office at Lake Road, Shahid Jaswant Singh Marg. Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Ranchi, District Ranchi. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandan Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Alok Dubey, Advocate ------ 02/ 24th March, 2026 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The prayer made in this writ petition is upon respondent Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 7 to carry out the construction of the cold storage in terms of the specifications and in terms of the report of the five men committee submitted vide letter no. 548 dated 28.11.2025 and the letter of the various authorities to the respondent no. 3 and 6 to confirm to the specifications and overcome the deficiencies in the said construction and direct the respondents to make good the financial 2026:JHHC:8306 2 losses caused to the petitioner. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the cold storage which was constructed is not according to aforesaid specifications. The petitioner claims that they are the beneficiaries of the cold storage, but they are not getting the benefits because of the construction of cold storage is not in accordance with the sanctioned plan. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that five men committee constituted by Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga, conducted an enquiry and found laches, but no action has been taken. He further submits that an appropriate direction may be given to the respondents to make necessary corrections as per the sanction plan and take appropriate action against the respondent No. 7. 5. The relief which the petitioner is seeking, cannot be granted in an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as this Court is not an expert to examine as to what would be the nature of constructions. Thus, I direct the petitioner to approach the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand who will look into the matter and pass an appropriate order and give necessary directions to the respondents if it is found that there are illegality and irregularities in the construction. 6. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending IA, if any also stands disposed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 24.03.2026 Pawan/CP-2 Uploaded 26.03.2026