Petitioner v. .Jeevani Vs The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District
WP Crl.(MD)/3178/2026 · 2026-06-17
L Victoria Gowri
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 40366 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 40366 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl.(MD) NO. 3178 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24-06-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI WP Crl.(MD) NO. 3178 of 2026 VS.Jeevani Petitioner Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District Tirunelveli - 627002.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police DCB I Tirunelveli District - 627002.
3. State of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police Dcb I Tirunelveli District - 627002.
4. M. Selvaraj
5. Santhana Selvi Muthu Mariappan Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): M/s.VS.Jeevani For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arun Arockiasamy, GA (Crl. side) Prayer: To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent police to conduct an inquiry, on the basis of the complaint dt. 20.05.2026 in CSR No. 214 of 2026 dt. 23.05.2026 which is pending on their file, and dispose of the pending CSR in accordance with law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ORDER Today the matter came up for hearing under the caption “For being mentioned”.
2. Petitioner's name in the order dated 17.06.2026 made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3178 of 2026 shall be corrected as VS.Jeevani instead of Vs.Jeevani.
3. Paragraph No.4 of the order dated 17.06.2026 made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3178 of 2026 shall be substituted as follows:
“4. Heard either side and carefully perused the materials available on record. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed as against the respondents 4 and 5, notice to them is dispensed with.”
4. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction and issue fresh order copy. 24-06-2026 Sml https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis