Sl.19 SwD 26.02.2026 Ct. No.34 C.R.R. 4644 of 2024 In Re: Debaprasad Mondal. ...Petitioner Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta, Mr. Arun Kumar Das. …. For the Petitioner. Mr. Soumya Nag, Mr. Aditya Tiwari, …. For the Opposite Party No.1. 1. Affidavit of service is filed before this Court be kept with the record. 2. Both the parties are represented through their respective learned Counsels. 3. It is submitted by both the learned Advocates that the matter has been settled amicable as the payment has been made to the present opposite party being de-facto complainant. 4. This revisional application has been filed challenging the order passed by in the Criminal Appeal affirming the judgment of conviction passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purba Medinipur at Tamluk in CR Case No.448/17. 5. The learned Advocate representing the opposite party also concede to the fact that his client received the amount and there is no further claim. 6. In view of the above development, the instruction given by the petitioner to the learned Advocate not to proceed with this further, and signed by both the learned advocates as filed before this Court be kept with the record. 2 7. Hence, this revisional application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.)