Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4034 (CAL)

KARTICK SINGHA ROY v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/400/2026 · 2026-01-28

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1. 1. (DL) (DL) 03.02.2026 03.02.2026 Ct. No. 02 (ARPAN) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 400 OF 2026 KARTICK SINGHA ROY VS. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Mr. Subhabrata Das, Adv. Mr. Mrinal Kanti Das, Adv. Mr. Arindam Banerjee, Adv. …for the North Barrackpore Municipality Mr. Debayan Ghosh, Adv. …for the Respondent No.8 1. Matter has come up in the list at the instance of the learned advocate representing North Barrackpore Municipality being respondent nos.6 & 7 seeking correction of the order dated 28th January, 2026. 2. In the cause title of the order dated 28th January, 2026 inadvertently ‘Barrackpore Municipality’ was transcribed instead of ‘North Barrackpore Municipality’. ‘Barrackpore Municipality’ shall be read as ‘North Barrackpore Municipality’. 3. Department is directed to incorporate necessary correction. 4. This order forms part of the order dated 28th January, 2026. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)