Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4034 (AP)

Smt. Gajula Sharmila, v. The Authorized Officer,

WP/13895/2026 · 2026-06-30

Battu Devanand, Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : _ Date of pronouncement : 01.07.2026 Date of uploading : 03.07.2026 APHC010261482026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3598] WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13895/2026 Between: 1. SMT. GAJULA SHARMILA,, W/O LATE SUBBA RAO, HINDU, AGED 64 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.26-15-1, VUNDAVALLI VARI STREET, GANDHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-520003 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, BANK OF MAHARASTRA, ZONAL OFFICE SITUATED AT 1ST FLOOR, INFINITY PLAZA, D.NO.59A- 21-7/3, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 520010 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF MAHARASTRA, BRANCH OFFICE SITUATED AT D.NO.27-16-75, BESANT ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-520002 3. M/S MAGNOVA EXIM PVT LTD, REP BY ITS DIRECTOR KIRAN KUMAR ADDEPALLI, HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS. GROUND FLOOR AND FIRST FLOOR, D.NO.59-5-11/1, RING ROAD, 4TH LANE. BESIDE GOVT.LTI, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.520007 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in taking steps to issue a sale certificate infavor of the 3rd respondent in respect of the mortgaged property situated at Krishna Nagar, Labbipet, Vijayawada, Patama Sub-Registry, Vijayawada, NTR District having an extent of 59514 Sq.Yards equitant to 494.674 meters of site with a RCC residential building with Ground, First and Second Floors there in Revenue Ward No.11, Block No.4, NTS No. 100, Municipal Ward No.29, Old Assessment No. 13191, 9172, 6840, subsequent Assessment No.26122M, present Assessment No. 1073109544, pending disposal of the Extension I.A.No. 1452/2026 in S.A.No. 127/2026 on the file of DRT, Visakapatnam is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.and consequently direct the 1st respondent not to take steps to issue sale certificate infavor of the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the Extension Petition I.A.No. 1452/2026 in S.A.No. 127/2026 on the file of DRT, Visakapatnam in the interest of justice and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 1st respondent not to take steps to issue a sale certificate in favour of the 3rd respondent in respect of the mortgaged property situated at Krishna Nagar, Labbipet, Vijayawada, Patama Sub- Registry, Vijayawada, NTR District, having an extent of 595>^ Sq.Yards equitant to 494.674 meters of site with a RCC residential building with Grond, First and Second Floors there in Revenue Ward No.11, Block No.4, NTS No. 100, Municipal Ward No.29, Old Assessment NO. 13191, 9172, 6840, subsequent Assessment No.26122M, present Assessment No. 1073109544, pending disposal of the Extension Petition I.A.No. 1452/2026 in S.A.No. 127/2026 on the file of DRT, Visakapatnam in the interest of justice and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N PREMRAJ Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CH MARKONDAIAH The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO WRIT PETITION No.13895 of 2026 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Sri.Y.Chakradhar Raju, learned counsel representing Sri. N. Premraj, learned counsel for the petitioner on record, would submit that as per the instructions of their client, they intend to withdraw this writ petition and sought permission of the Court. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Petitioner is granted liberty to ventilate her remedies, if so aggrieved, in accordance with law. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND ______________________________________________ JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date:01.07.2026 SA 4 Whether the order is : Speaking 𝑌𝑒𝑠 /No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable 𝑌𝑒𝑠 /No 5 𝟖𝟖 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO WRIT PETITION No.13895 of 2026 Date:01.07.2026 SA