Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2026:UHC:1883
(Delay Condonation Appl. No.01 of 2026) In BA1 No.263 of 2026 Hira Lama Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present bail application is filed by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No.398 of 2025 under Sections 123, 305 (A), 62, 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyaaya Sanhita, P.S. Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is not named in the FIR; he has no criminal history; he has been roped in in the instant case only on the basis of suspicion and he is languishing in jail since about six months.
6. Learned State counsel has strongly opposed the bail application.
7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the present bail application and considering the facts and circumstance of the case, applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
8. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Hira Lama be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned.
9. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
18.03.2026 Arti