Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40300 (KAR)

SRI R KODANDARAMAN v. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS

WP/43759/2011 · 2026-09-15

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010081232011 NC: 2026:KHC:50029 WP No. 43759 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 43759 OF 2011 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: SRI R KODANDARAMAN S/O SRI RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/AT NO.166, 1ST CROSS 4TH MAIN ROAD, VIVEKNAGAR BANGALORE-560047. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S SUBHASH BY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING,NRUPATUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 2 KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.14/3 RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGLAROE-560001. 3. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE(CRIMES) C.C.B, BANGALORE. 4. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES Digitally Signed by NARENDRA PRASAD HAREKOPPA THIMMANNA GOWDA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010081232011 NC: 2026:KHC:50029 WP No. 43759 of 2011 1ST FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P V CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2: SRI. M. RAJA KUMAR, AGA FOR R3 & R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT TO THE PETITIONER FORTHWITH FOR HAVING ACQUIRED THE PETITIONERS SCHEDULE LAND ALONG WITH INTEREST AT 18% P.A FROM THE DATE OF NOTIFICATION FOR ACQUISITION TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H .T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 15.09.2026 stating that this writ petition does not survive for consideration. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the above writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 23 Digitally Signed by NARENDRA PRASAD HAREKOPPA THIMMANNA GOWDA