Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4030 (KAR)

SMT. RUDRAMMA v. SMT. CHANDRAMMA

RSA/331/2017 · 2026-04-22

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21866 RSA No. 331 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 331 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RUDRAMMA W/O VEERABHADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS HOUSE WIFE R/O OPP: BHARATH THEATRE CHALLAKERE ROAD JAGALUR TOWN DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 528 2. SMT. D. RATHNAMMA W/O D. VEERANNA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/O OLD TALUK OFFICE ROAD HORAKERE EXTENSION JAGALUR TOWN DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 528 3. SMT. SHANTHAVEERAMMA @ SHANTHAMMA W/O AJJAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O MUGGIDARAGIHALLI VILLAGE JAGALUR TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 528 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SADHANA N, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SANTOSH R. NELKUDRI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21866 RSA No. 331 of 2017 AND: 1. SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O LATE CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS HOUSE WIFE R/O HORAKERE EXTENSION JAGALUR TOWN DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 528 2. D. VEERESH S/O LATE CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O HORAKERE EXTENSION JAGALUR TOWN DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 528 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAGADISH HIREMATH AND SRI. H.K. SATHEESH, ADVOCATES FOR C/R1 AND R2) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.11.2016 PASSED IN RA NO.13/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.12.2014 PASSED IN OS NO.74/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR, IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO ITEM NO.4 OF THE PROPERTY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21866 RSA No. 331 of 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the matter is settled between the parties. 2. In that view of the matter, appeal is dismissed as not-pressed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE LRS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 26