Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40289 (CAL)

SAURABH GUPTA v. ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS.

APOT/158/2026 · 2026-09-14

Aryak Dutt, Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OCD-1 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Commercial Appellate Division ORIGINAL SIDE APOT/158/2026 SAURABH GUPTA -VS- ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK -AND- The Hon’ble JUSTICE ARYAK DUTT Date: September 14, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Krishnaraj Thaker, Sr. Adv. Ms. Suchismita Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Abir Lal Ghosh, Adv. Ms. Aradhita Banerjee, Adv. ...for the appellant Mr. Avinash Kankani, Adv. Ms. Shree Chatterjee, Adv. ...for the respondent no. 1 Mr. Sayantan Bose, Adv. Ms. Pooja Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Arti Bhattacharyya, Adv. ...for the respondent no. 2 The Court: Appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated August 6, 2026. Although Court fees as that of an appeal from a decree was paid by the appellant, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that, inadvertently the appeal was filed as an appeal from order. He submits that, the appeal from order be directed to be treated as an appeal from decree. Respondents are represented. 2 Since, the appeal is directed against a decree, the Department will treat the present appeal as an appeal from decree. Department will number the appeal as an appeal from decree. On doing so, the Department will treat APOT/158/2026 as disposed of. Appellant will prepare informal paper book incorporating all papers used before the learned Trial Judge within two weeks from date. List the appeal from decree three weeks hence. (DEBANGSU BASAK, J.) (ARYAK DUTT, J.) sp3